The Sumerian Flood Tablet
CBS10673 + CBS10867 · CDLI P265876
Trace a named clay witness, the basis of its date, its acquisition credit and a modern composite translation.
Follow this document ↗Follow the author, surviving copy, discovery, custody, dating method and translation. Open questions stay beside the evidence that could resolve them.
Selected Enoch evidence updated 9 November 2026 · Other pilot biographies reviewed 7 November 2026 · Public factual summaries; private source files remain separate.
CBS10673 + CBS10867 · CDLI P265876
Trace a named clay witness, the basis of its date, its acquisition credit and a modern composite translation.
Follow this document ↗4Q201 · 4Q Enᵃ
Trace 4Q201’s Aramaic Enoch text, writing on both faces, a measured parchment sample and the questions still open about its author, recovery and translation.
Follow this document ↗Mingana Islamic Arabic 560 · catalogue 1902
One codex preserves a base treatise and a separate supplement. Follow their authors, damaged passages and comparison manuscripts separately.
Follow this document ↗4Q208 · 4Q Enastrᵃ · IAA plate 814
Follow this Aramaic astronomical witness through its identity, selected lunar-calendar passage, dating evidence and open edition questions.
Follow this document ↗4Q209 · 4Q Enastrᵇ · IAA plate 847
Follow this Aramaic astronomical witness through its identity, selected lunar-calendar passage, dating evidence and open edition questions.
Follow this document ↗Record the work’s traditional attribution separately from a documented author or compiler. A scribe copied a physical witness; a finder or archaeologist belongs to its recovery history. An unnamed person remains unnamed until evidence identifies them. Modern editors and translators receive their own credits.
These counts come from the existing 58-assessment coverage map, not from the number of biographies. An assessment is one selected witness/object lead. A known translation of a work does not establish coverage of every surviving copy.
“Coverage not checked” is a research task. No selected assessment currently satisfies the map’s documented-search threshold for declaring that no translation was located. No global untranslated percentage can be calculated from this selection.
Each pilot claim has three evidence slots. A slot can support, challenge, supply context, depend on an earlier source, or remain pending. Three pages repeating a museum record remain one underlying source group. Even three independent sources must address the same proposition before they can corroborate it.
The slots do not manufacture certainty, certify a genealogy or require us to conceal a well-documented fact while further evidence is sought. A disputed reading remains visible. The 2025 handwriting model’s dependence on radiocarbon reference data is recorded when comparing methods.
5 of 30 Reading Room object/witness leads have a structured pilot biography. “Pilot reviewed” means the fields and stated evidence were reviewed; it does not mean every question has been answered. 25 leads still need structured histories.
30 witness leads shown
No matching witness leads. Try another name or reset the filters.
Keep a named group inside a text, a proposed author’s identity, a copying community and an archaeological findspot in separate fields. A language, shared symbol or place-name is not proof of tribal ancestry. Connections can be documented as an attribution, proposal, disagreement or unresolved question.
In Babylon, the Father’s light opens perspective, learning and a chosen next step. Your worth remains intact. Every person is sovereign, with dignity, freedom and room to grow.
Read the learning principle ↗Follow 4Q208 and 4Q209, the Moon’s schematic cycle, the fuller Enoch names and all twenty-two Babylon letter correspondences.
Astronomical Enoch, with the letter map ↗