The Institution Access Desk

Hello,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre (learn.babylonencyclopedia.com), an independent comparative-text learning project. We are checking exact editions for source-linked study guides.

We are seeking Daniel A. Machiela’s The Dead Sea Genesis Apocryphon: A New Text and Translation with Introduction and Special Treatment of Columns 13–17 (2009; eBook ISBN 9789047443018), and Ben Zion Wacholder’s The New Damascus Document (2007; ISBN 9789004141087).

We also welcome a recommendation for a current English Dead Sea Scrolls edition that clearly identifies 1QM, CD and Qumran witnesses, with manuscript gaps and editorial reconstructions distinguished. Please advise the scope of coverage rather than assuming any one volume contains every fragment.

Could you advise the lawful full-text reading options, including library access or any research/review access for which the project might be eligible? If purchase is required, please provide options and a quote only. This inquiry does not authorize an order or charges. We are seeking reading access and bibliographical accuracy, not permission to republish copyrighted full texts. Please direct us to the appropriate colleague if needed.

Thank you,Babylon Learning Centre

Dear Sales Operations team,

Thank you for offering to route our enquiry. Before supplying a postal address or seeking an institutional licence, could you direct an independent research project to self-service reading options or explain the minimum location information needed for routing?

The two titles are Daniel A. Machiela, The Dead Sea Genesis Apocryphon (2009; eBook ISBN 9789047443018), and Ben Zion Wacholder, The New Damascus Document (2007; ISBN 9789004141087).

We would welcome existing library-access routes, individual reading formats or a quotation only. Please distinguish:
- licensed reading access from a downloadable study copy;
- a single researcher's use from storage in a staff-only shared research database;
- either of those uses from public redistribution, which we are not requesting through a reading-access purchase.

If a full postal address is necessary even to provide these options, please explain why and which fields are required. We will arrange any necessary details separately.

This is an information request. No purchase, subscription, licence acceptance, reproduction order or other charge is authorized. We will not reproduce private correspondence automatically.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/
Reference: BLC-HISTORY-20261107

Dear Genizah Research Unit,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. We are checking exact witnesses and lawful routes from source material to public study guides.

Your publications identify T-S 10K6 and T-S 16.311 as the two Cairo Genizah witnesses of the Damascus Document/Zadokite Work. We would like to compare the surviving pages with their published editions, keeping these medieval copies distinct from the Qumran fragments. Please confirm the current classmarks, digitized-page coverage and any image/edition concordance.

Could you provide or point us to existing digital images or files (including all inscribed faces or folios), stable catalogue identifiers, and any available IIIF manifests, downloadable metadata or imaging documentation? Existing public links are welcome; we are not asking for new photography at this stage.

Please identify the relevant published transcription/transliteration, critical edition and English translation, including which surviving passages they cover. If you know of surviving passages still unedited, unreadable or untranslated, please identify them precisely and note any current scholarly work. Physical losses, uncertain readings and lack of access will be recorded separately.

Our intended use is source-linked study on a publicly accessible website, with any new interpretation clearly attributed to Babylon. Which files or metadata may be displayed, embedded or redistributed, and under what licence, attribution, language, translation/derivative and commercial/noncommercial conditions? If permission or fees are required, please provide the process and a quote only; do not begin chargeable work.

If access is limited, please identify the affected item, the reason and applicable public policy, an alternative reading route, and any review or reconsideration process. A reference or referral is sufficient where your office does not hold the material. Please identify the responding office and whether we may publish a concise attributed summary of the factual answer. We will not publish private correspondence automatically.

This inquiry authorizes no purchase, paid research, new digitization, translation commission or reproduction order. Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/
Register: https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/resources/ancient-text-translations/

Hello,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre (learn.babylonencyclopedia.com), an independent comparative-text learning project. We are checking exact editions for source-linked study guides.

We would like access to Loren T. Stuckenbruck’s The Book of Giants from Qumran: Texts, Translation, and Commentary (1997; eBook ISBN 9783161587887; DOI 10.1628/978-3-16-158788-7), including its English translation, fragment identifications and apparatus. Please also advise whether a newer edition should be used.

Could you advise the lawful full-text reading options, including library access or any research/review access for which the project might be eligible? If purchase is required, please provide options and a quote only. This inquiry does not authorize an order or charges. We are seeking reading access and bibliographical accuracy, not permission to republish copyrighted full texts. Please direct us to the appropriate colleague if needed.

Thank you,Babylon Learning Centre

Hello,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre (learn.babylonencyclopedia.com), an independent comparative-text learning project. We are checking exact editions for source-linked study guides.

Please route this inquiry to the appropriate Routledge books team. We are seeking Hermann Hunger and John Steele’s The Babylonian Astronomical Compendium MUL.APIN (2019; ISBN 9781315168722), including the English translation, transliteration and commentary. We need the actual edition before preparing detailed line-by-line studies.

Could you advise the lawful full-text reading options, including library access or any research/review access for which the project might be eligible? If purchase is required, please provide options and a quote only. This inquiry does not authorize an order or charges. We are seeking reading access and bibliographical accuracy, not permission to republish copyrighted full texts. Please direct us to the appropriate colleague if needed.

Thank you,Babylon Learning Centre

Dear NASA History Office and UHCL Archives teams,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre, an independent public
learning project. Thank you for preserving the records that make this
research possible. We are tracing Apollo 11’s published results back to
identifiable measurements, processing methods and archive holdings.

Our source-linked investigation is here:
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/research/apollo-11-journey/#investigation

Could you help identify existing digital copies, catalogue references or
the current custodians for three record groups?

1. Numerical trajectory listing. The foreword to NASA-CR-108349, Apollo
Mission 11: Trajectory Reconstruction and Postflight Analysis, Volume I (16
March 1970; NTRS 19700014995), identifies a separate Volume II containing
the 45-day best-estimate trajectory in NASA Apollo Trajectory (NAT) format.
We have Volume I. Where can we find Volume II, any machine-readable
version, its revision history and the associated coordinate/time
definitions and uncertainty documentation? We understand the office/address
printed in 1970 may no longer apply.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19700014995

2. Earth-entry reconstruction inputs. We have located Robert H. Manders’s
Apollo 11 Entry Postflight Analysis, MSC Internal Note 70-FM-30 (20
February 1970). Sections 3–4 describe the adjusted entry state and model
fit. Are the EMS scroll scan, time-tagged ARIA downlink records, simulation
input/configuration files, calibration/timing descriptions and any
uncertainty or later revision records available? We seek the supporting
inputs, rather than another copy of the report.
https://www.apollojournals.org/afj/ap11fj/pdf/19740072963_as11-entry-analysis-19700220.pdf

3. Technical dosimetry records. The mission report’s preliminary
personal-meter and VABD results differ in instrument and possibly interval
from later summaries. TN D-7080, Table I, identifies 0.18 rad as the Apollo
11 passive-TLD mission average. Atwell’s 1979 proceedings paper, Table III
(NASA-TM-81061, Volume 2, printed p.126), also compares calculated and
measured VABD totals. Which mission-specific calibration,
integration-period and readout/reduction records connect these results? We
are not assuming that the TLD average is a corrected personal-meter total,
and we do not need protected individual medical records.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19730010172
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800016185

Links, accession/box/folder identifiers, format notes and the responsible
office would be very helpful. If a requested record is unavailable, please
distinguish any documented disposition from an unlocated record or an
access restriction. Please also advise on access and
reproduction/publication conditions; we understand UHCL’s published
NASA-material access requirements must be checked directly.

This is an initial bibliographical and custodian inquiry, not a request to
create new analysis or a formal FOIA filing. No paid search, reproduction
order or fees are authorized. Please let us know before any chargeable
work. If another office is responsible, a referral would be appreciated.

With thanks,
Eve
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/

Dear Matthew and NASA History Office team,

Thank you, Matthew, for explaining UHCL's staffing limits and the restrictions you attribute to NASA Headquarters. We understand that UHCL does not own the loaned JSC records and cannot override NASA's policy. We appreciate the work involved in preserving them.

We are narrowing our follow-up to existing policy documents, catalogue references and routing information, rather than asking UHCL to perform technical analysis.

1. Governing memorandum and scope
Please identify the NASA memorandum behind the access changes described as effective in October 2024: its title, date, reference number, issuing office and a publicly releasable copy or link. Please identify the applicable export-control provisions or determination records, and clarify whether the restrictions apply to the entire collection, particular series, or selected technical content. How are already published or previously cleared records treated?

2. Holdings and responsible custodians
Our original inquiry identified three record groups: Volume II of NASA-CR-108349 (the 45-day best-estimate trajectory listing and NAT format documentation); the supporting EMS/ARIA records and simulation inputs for 70-FM-30; and Apollo 11 technical dosimetry calibration, integration and readout/reduction records. We understand your reply does not establish whether these are held at UHCL. Existing finding-aid entries, accession/box/folder identifiers, transfer references, or a referral to the responsible NASA/NARA custodian would help us avoid an unnecessarily broad search. Please distinguish unlocated records from confirmed restrictions or documented disposition.

3. Researcher eligibility and permitted use
Could NASA provide the current application form and clarify whether an independent U.S.-citizen researcher unaffiliated with NASA or UHCL can apply? Please distinguish citizenship, institutional affiliation and NASA approval requirements, including the policy for international researchers. The guidance permits researcher notes while barring copying: what kinds of notes, numerical transcription, quotation and subsequent publication are permitted? We are seeking the rules, not an exception or a way around them.

4. Public access and review routes
Which existing unrestricted inventories, released editions or copies, and releasable portions can be provided remotely? If our requested materials are covered by a restriction, could the responsible office identify the record-specific basis and the available review route? UHCL's description also points to originals at the National Archives; please provide any known transfer or record-series references. If a formal NASA records request is the appropriate next step, please direct us to the responsible office and the best existing identifiers.

The incoming private email and its headers are not reproduced. Our public record distinguishes access restrictions from unconfirmed holdings and unanswered questions. We welcome factual corrections and a concise institutional response that we may summarize with attribution; please flag personal or protected information that should remain private.

This remains an informal bibliographical and policy inquiry, not a formal FOIA submission. We authorize no fees, paid research, reproduction order or chargeable work.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre

Dear Cadbury Research Library team,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. We are checking exact witnesses and lawful routes from source material to public study guides.

Our Qur’an research begins with the catalogue, complete surviving folio coverage and existing electronic editions for Mingana Islamic Arabic 1572a. Your FAQs also identify 1572b and 1563: please point us to their catalogue entries, verse coverage and available digital files. We understand that preservation can prevent public consultation of originals and that private-study downloads do not automatically permit publication.

We are separately studying Surah Nuh (71), particularly 71:15–16, and the Noah narrative in Hud 11:25–49. We do not assume these passages occur on the Birmingham fragment. If an identified digitized witness in your collection preserves them, a shelfmark and folio reference would be helpful. We will distinguish the parchment’s radiocarbon date from the date of writing and preserve uncertainties.

Could you provide or point us to existing digital images or files (including all inscribed faces or folios), stable catalogue identifiers, and any available IIIF manifests, downloadable metadata or imaging documentation? Existing public links are welcome; we are not asking for new photography at this stage.

Please identify the relevant published transcription/transliteration, critical edition and English translation, including which surviving passages they cover. If you know of surviving passages still unedited, unreadable or untranslated, please identify them precisely and note any current scholarly work. Physical losses, uncertain readings and lack of access will be recorded separately.

Our intended use is source-linked study on a publicly accessible website, with any new interpretation clearly attributed to Babylon. Which files or metadata may be displayed, embedded or redistributed, and under what licence, attribution, language, translation/derivative and commercial/noncommercial conditions? If permission or fees are required, please provide the process and a quote only; do not begin chargeable work.

If access is limited, please identify the affected item, the reason and applicable public policy, an alternative reading route, and any review or reconsideration process. A reference or referral is sufficient where your office does not hold the material. Please identify the responding office and whether we may publish a concise attributed summary of the factual answer. We will not publish private correspondence automatically.

This inquiry authorizes no purchase, paid research, new digitization, translation commission or reproduction order. Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/
Register: https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/resources/ancient-text-translations/

Dear Cadbury Research Library team,

Thank you for the catalogue and collection-tree routes. We have followed them and found the collection entry’s invitation to request volume IV, Islamic Arabic Manuscripts, as a PDF for personal use.

Could you please send that existing catalogue PDF by your usual transfer route, or direct us to the appropriate request process? Our immediate purpose is to check the catalogue descriptions for Mingana Islamic Arabic 1572b and 1563 alongside the already identified 1572a.

We will use the PDF for research and cite the catalogue; we will not upload or redistribute it, or assume that receiving it grants manuscript-image publication rights. This is a request for the existing catalogue, not new photography, paid research or a reproduction order. Please advise before any chargeable service.

Thank you for your help,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/

Dear Mark and Cadbury Research Library team,

Thank you again for sending the three parts of volume IV. We have received them and are using them privately for research. Reviewing the catalogue has given us three narrower questions; pointers to existing records or publications would be very helpful.

Islamic Arabic 1563: verse-number concordance. On printed page 1, catalogue entry 1 lists fol. 11a as 11:46–51 and 11b as 11:51–57. Corpus Coranicum currently labels 11r as 11:44:10–11:49:4 and 11v as 11:49:5–11:54:5 (11r record). Is there an existing explanation of the catalogue’s numbering convention, correction, or concordance? We are retaining both references until they can be reconciled, rather than assuming an error or a textual difference.

Islamic Arabic 560: catalogue entry 1902, printed page 353. The description distinguishes al-Khujandi’s instrument treatise, missing sections, a fragment on fol. 30, and Hibatallah’s appendix on fols. 31–35. Could you point us to any current contents/foliation record, existing images or microfiche, and the shelfmark of the Bodleian comparison manuscript mentioned there? An existing edition or study reference would also help; we are not asking you to undertake a new collation.

Existing microfiche access. The 1985 introduction and collection-level record identify a microfiche route. What is the current way to consult or obtain existing study copies for 1563, 1572b, 560 and the calendar manuscript 571 (catalogue 1915, printed page 356)? Please distinguish any available digital scans from microfiche consultation and any separate publication-permission requirements.

If another colleague or published finding aid is the better route, a referral is welcome. This is an enquiry about existing material only: no paid research, new photography, reproduction order or translation commission is authorized. Please advise before any chargeable service. We will not redistribute the supplied catalogue or publish private correspondence automatically.

Many thanks,
Babylon Learning Centre
learn.babylonencyclopedia.com
Reference: BLC-BIRM-20261105 / catalogue follow-up, 6 November 2026

Hello,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre (learn.babylonencyclopedia.com), an independent comparative-text learning project. We are checking exact editions for source-linked study guides.

A source list supplied to our project contains the label “Vatican Archives (Filtered)” and describes it as “internal tracking of the 2026 Venus completion.” It supplies no author, document title, date, fonds or shelfmark. We have not verified that this description corresponds to any document and will not present it as established archival evidence.

Could you advise whether the label corresponds to a known public catalogue entry or publication, or which finding aid would be appropriate to consult? If it is not identifiable from these details, please let us know what information would be required. We understand that the Apostolic Archive and Apostolic Library are separate institutions. This is a bibliographical identification inquiry, not a request for unrestricted archival access, a translation commission or a paid reproduction order.

Thank you,Babylon Learning Centre

Dear Mr Grilli,

Thank you for your reply of 30 October. We have recorded that the supplied
label does not identify a matching reference in the Vatican Apostolic
Archive. We will not cite it as established archival evidence.

To describe your response accurately, could you clarify whether the
description was insufficient to identify a document, or whether you were
able to identify a specific reference and determine that it does not belong
to your Archive? We understand that these are different findings.

If a further bibliographical check is appropriate, which minimum
identifying details and public finding aid would be needed? If the matter
instead belongs to another institution, a referral would be helpful only if
you consider one appropriate.

We are not asking you to establish that no such document exists anywhere.
This is a clarification request only; no paid research, reproduction or
translation order is authorized. Please let us know whether we may
attribute a brief summary of your response to your office in our source
register.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/

Dear Antiquities collections team,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. We are checking exact witnesses and lawful routes from source material to public study guides.

We are studying the Sumerian King List prism AN1923.444, described on your Sumerian King List page. We seek images and edition guidance for the entire inscribed object, with its own damaged or uncertain readings marked, while keeping this witness distinct from other King List copies. We do not treat its literary reign totals as independently established elapsed chronology.

Could you provide or point us to existing digital images or files (including all inscribed faces or folios), stable catalogue identifiers, and any available IIIF manifests, downloadable metadata or imaging documentation? Existing public links are welcome; we are not asking for new photography at this stage.

Please identify the relevant published transcription/transliteration, critical edition and English translation, including which surviving passages they cover. If you know of surviving passages still unedited, unreadable or untranslated, please identify them precisely and note any current scholarly work. Physical losses, uncertain readings and lack of access will be recorded separately.

Our intended use is source-linked study on a publicly accessible website, with any new interpretation clearly attributed to Babylon. Which files or metadata may be displayed, embedded or redistributed, and under what licence, attribution, language, translation/derivative and commercial/noncommercial conditions? If permission or fees are required, please provide the process and a quote only; do not begin chargeable work.

If access is limited, please identify the affected item, the reason and applicable public policy, an alternative reading route, and any review or reconsideration process. A reference or referral is sufficient where your office does not hold the material. Please identify the responding office and whether we may publish a concise attributed summary of the factual answer. We will not publish private correspondence automatically.

This inquiry authorizes no purchase, paid research, new digitization, translation commission or reproduction order. Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/
Register: https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/resources/ancient-text-translations/

Dear Special Collections Enquiries team,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. Cadbury Research Library directed our Oxford comparison question to the Bodleian. We are seeking existing catalogue and access information, not a new collation or research commission.

Our starting point is MS Huntington 566, identified by ISMI as a witness of al-Khujandi’s Kitab al-alah al-shamilah: ISMI witness record. We are comparing it with Birmingham, Mingana Islamic Arabic 560 (Hopwood, volume IV, revised edition 1985, catalogue 1902, p. 353), whose description notes missing sections and a separate Hibatallah supplement.

Could you confirm Huntington 566’s current shelfmark, stable catalogue record and the exact folios containing this treatise, including any recorded losses or incomplete sections?

Are existing digital images, microfilm/microfiche copies or other remote study surrogates available? Please point us to any existing viewer, manifest or study-copy route and distinguish research access from publication or sharing permission.

Which existing edition, translation, detailed description or comparative study should be cited for this witness? We found a bibliographical guide reporting Richard Lorch’s work on an edition and translation; we would welcome a published reference or referral for its current status rather than assuming no edition exists.

Does an existing catalogue identify a related Hibatallah work in MS Marsh 663, ff. 163–189? We have seen this as a possible related text, not an established duplicate of Birmingham’s appendix, and would appreciate the correct record or referral.

Links or existing bibliographical references are sufficient. This inquiry authorizes no paid research, new digitization, photography, translation commission or reproduction order. Please advise before any chargeable service. We will not publish private correspondence automatically; public catalogue information would be cited with its source.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
learn.babylonencyclopedia.com
Reference: BLC-OXF-20261106

Dear Corpus Coranicum team,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. We are checking exact witnesses and lawful routes from source material to public study guides.

We are building a source-linked Qur’an reading pathway focused first on Surah Nuh (71), including 71:15–16, and Hud 11:25–49. We want the Arabic source evidence, published scholarship and our own authored comparative interpretation to remain distinguishable.

Could you point us to manuscript records that actually preserve these passages, with current holding institution, shelfmark, folio/image identifier, dating basis and transcription? Where recorded, we also seek links to documented textual/reading variants, relevant commentary or intertexts and existing named translations. Please distinguish unpreserved words, uncertain readings, material not yet edited and material simply unavailable through this website.

Is there a documented download/export/API or other route for the relevant images, transcriptions and metadata? Which components are your own licensed data, and which require permission from a holding institution or translator? Please provide the applicable attribution, reuse and translation/derivative terms. We will not infer permission to republish a manuscript photograph from access to its database record.

If a relevant file is not publicly available, please identify the precise record, restriction or missing work and a legitimate request route. Please identify the responding scholarly role and whether we may publish a concise attributed summary. We welcome corrections to our framing and references to existing editions before considering any new translation work.

This is a bounded bibliographic and permissions inquiry, not a request to endorse Babylon’s thesis. No purchase, fee, paid research or translation commission is authorized. Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/

Dear Middle East collections team,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. We are checking exact witnesses and lawful routes from source material to public study guides.

Our initial targets are the Venus Tablet K.160 and the Flood Tablet commonly referenced as K.3375 (Gilgamesh XI). Please confirm the exact current catalogue references. We also seek a catalogue or edition concordance identifying your principal witnesses to Atrahasis, Enuma Elish and MUL.APIN; we do not presume those works survive in a single complete tablet. For this first request, links and guidance on a manageable selection are sufficient.

Could you provide or point us to existing digital images or files (including all inscribed faces or folios), stable catalogue identifiers, and any available IIIF manifests, downloadable metadata or imaging documentation? Existing public links are welcome; we are not asking for new photography at this stage.

Please identify the relevant published transcription/transliteration, critical edition and English translation, including which surviving passages they cover. If you know of surviving passages still unedited, unreadable or untranslated, please identify them precisely and note any current scholarly work. Physical losses, uncertain readings and lack of access will be recorded separately.

Our intended use is source-linked study on a publicly accessible website, with any new interpretation clearly attributed to Babylon. Which files or metadata may be displayed, embedded or redistributed, and under what licence, attribution, language, translation/derivative and commercial/noncommercial conditions? If permission or fees are required, please provide the process and a quote only; do not begin chargeable work.

If access is limited, please identify the affected item, the reason and applicable public policy, an alternative reading route, and any review or reconsideration process. A reference or referral is sufficient where your office does not hold the material. Please identify the responding office and whether we may publish a concise attributed summary of the factual answer. We will not publish private correspondence automatically.

This inquiry authorizes no purchase, paid research, new digitization, translation commission or reproduction order. Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/
Register: https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/resources/ancient-text-translations/

Dear Coptic Museum manuscript team,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. We are checking exact witnesses and lawful routes from source material to public study guides.

Your Ministry-hosted museum page identifies the Nag Hammadi codices among the collection’s important manuscripts. Our first focus is Codex II material containing the Gospel of Thomas and the Apocryphon of John. Please confirm the present institutional custody, inventory/shelfmark and page identifiers rather than treating a modern translation title as a manuscript number. For the Apocryphon of John, we will distinguish the different recensions and witnesses.

Could you provide or point us to existing digital images or files (including all inscribed faces or folios), stable catalogue identifiers, and any available IIIF manifests, downloadable metadata or imaging documentation? Existing public links are welcome; we are not asking for new photography at this stage.

Please identify the relevant published transcription/transliteration, critical edition and English translation, including which surviving passages they cover. If you know of surviving passages still unedited, unreadable or untranslated, please identify them precisely and note any current scholarly work. Physical losses, uncertain readings and lack of access will be recorded separately.

Our intended use is source-linked study on a publicly accessible website, with any new interpretation clearly attributed to Babylon. Which files or metadata may be displayed, embedded or redistributed, and under what licence, attribution, language, translation/derivative and commercial/noncommercial conditions? If permission or fees are required, please provide the process and a quote only; do not begin chargeable work.

If access is limited, please identify the affected item, the reason and applicable public policy, an alternative reading route, and any review or reconsideration process. A reference or referral is sufficient where your office does not hold the material. Please identify the responding office and whether we may publish a concise attributed summary of the factual answer. We will not publish private correspondence automatically.

This inquiry authorizes no purchase, paid research, new digitization, translation commission or reproduction order. Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/
Register: https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/resources/ancient-text-translations/

Dear CDLI team,

I’m writing for Babylon Learning Centre with a focused bibliographical question about CT 46, 5 / P285813:
https://cdli.earth/artifacts/285813

We have checked the current joined accession numbers K.11261 + K.11624 + K.12054, the linked eBL records, and the English edition in Glassner, Mesopotamian Chronicles (2004), pp. 126–131. We are not treating this as an untranslated text.

Could you point us to existing documentation for three remaining checks?

1. The published join drawing or photograph identifying the positions of all three fragments, particularly K.12054, and the preferred citation for that join.
2. An older KeiBi bibliographical abstract gives K.11264 as the middle number, whereas CDLI and eBL give K.11624. Is there a published correction or identifier history explaining this discrepancy? We have not assumed which source introduced it:
https://vergil.uni-tuebingen.de/keibi/Record/KEI00080544/Details
3. An existing concordance between the joined photograph, eBL’s primed lines 7′–14′ and Glassner’s composite column i22–29. We have matched the edited sequence, but have not independently collated the signs against the photograph.

An existing reference, correction or referral is sufficient; this is not a request for new collation, photography, paid research or a translation commission. If a point is outside CDLI’s remit, please let us know.

May we publish a concise attributed factual summary of your guidance? Private correspondence will not be reproduced automatically.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/research/flood-kings-and-human-time/

Dear Dr Henry and the Oxyrhynchus Papyri team,

I’m writing for Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. We are distinguishing surviving text that is unpublished or untranslated from physical losses, unreadable writing, unavailable editions and reproduction restrictions.

Your public pages describe an extensive fragment collection, translated publications, appointment access and a publication-assignment policy. We would appreciate an existing catalogue or finding aid identifying a manageable selection of unpublished or unassigned literary or religious papyri suitable for further research. We do not assume that an unpublished item has never been transcribed or translated, or that fragment totals count independent texts.

For each suggested item, could you identify its inventory number, current custodian, language, surviving coverage, latest publication/translation and any work in progress? Which are genuinely without a published English translation, which are unreadable, and which simply lack freely accessible editions? Please correct our categories where needed.

Could you point us to existing lawful images, metadata or IIIF links and explain access, first-publication, quotation, translation and image-reuse permissions separately? If an assignment limits access, what period, renewal or reconsideration process applies, and what qualified independent collaboration would be welcome? We seek existing files or links, not new photography.

Please provide free reading routes first. Any fee requires a quote and separate written authorization; no order, paid research or translation commission is authorized. May we publish a concise attributed factual summary of your response on our public access desk? Private correspondence will not be reproduced automatically.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/

Dear HMML research services team,

I’m writing for Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. We are using your catalogue to distinguish manuscript images, transcriptions, editions, translations and unassessed coverage. Thank you for making these research routes available.

Could you point us to existing bibliographical guidance for these three records, or refer this small query to the appropriate curator?

1. GG 00151, C3-IV-2, Gunda Gundē Monastery, Enoch at fols. 2r–58v:
https://w3id.org/vhmml/readingRoom/view/138153
We have the catalogue’s Mordini (1953) and Erho–Stuckenbruck (2013) references. Does HMML record any further published diplomatic edition, collation or translation specifically using this witness?

2. HMML 00649, Ms. Frag. 31:
https://w3id.org/vhmml/readingRoom/view/500878
The catalogue identifies Qur’an 83:32–85:8 with an interlinear Persian translation. Is a translator, translation tradition or published study identified in existing documentation?

3. SAV BMH 34118, Mamma Haidara Library:
https://w3id.org/vhmml/readingRoom/view/172364
The catalogue tentatively describes a derivative of al-Zamakhsharī’s al-Kashshāf with Arabic/Persian glosses. Is there an updated identification or witness-specific edition reference?

If edition or English-translation status is not tracked, that answer is useful: we will label it “not assessed,” not “untranslated.” We are asking for existing references or reading routes, not a new translation, full manuscript assessment, image order or paid service.

May we publish a concise attributed factual summary of your guidance on our research desk? We will not reproduce private correspondence automatically.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/

Dear Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library team,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text project. A separate, reviewed research-desk request concerns the Damascus Document witness 4Q271. This message concerns additional works and is not a repeat request for 4Q271.

Our next targets are Book of Giants material identified as 4Q203, and a manageable selection of Qumran witnesses to 1 Enoch and Jubilees. Please confirm current custody and provide the manuscript, fragment, plate and image identifiers. We understand that surviving fragments do not amount to complete books.

Could you point us to existing downloadable images, infrared/color files, metadata and any IIIF or documented export route? For each selected fragment, which published transcription and translation covers it, and where are damaged, missing or disputed readings marked? If any surviving passages remain unedited or untranslated, please identify them and any active edition project; an incomplete manuscript and an untranslated manuscript are different gaps.

We read your website’s help and licensing terms. What permission and attribution are required to display or embed selected images, publish a new checked translation or commentary, or redistribute metadata on a publicly accessible learning site? We welcome open links first. Please identify any restrictions, their policy basis and a legitimate request or review route.

We also ask whether a qualified specialist or public scholarly project can independently check a selected fragment-level transcription/translation. Please identify the responding office and whether we may publish a concise attributed factual summary; we will not automatically publish the private reply.

No paid research, new imaging, translation commission, purchase or reproduction order is authorized. Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/resources/ancient-text-translations/

Dear Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library team,

A focused follow-up to our 5 November inquiry: we have narrowed the next check to 4Q201/4Q338 sample P904-Fr009, rather than requesting a broad selection.

Popović et al. (2025), S10 Table S20, PDF p. 3, identifies plate 904, sample P904-Fr009, DJD 36 plate I fragment 2, with a bottom-right sample location. Your public record B-366868 identifies plate 904, fragment 9, recto (May 2012). Its outline appears to match the photograph of 4Q201 fragment 2 in Michaël Langlois, Le premier manuscrit du Livre d’Hénoch (2008), pp. 389–390. The older photographic inventory connects museum plate 904 / M26 with PAM 43.198. We are treating this as a provisional concordance, not a custodian-confirmed identification of the sampled cut.

Could you please help with three precise questions?
1. Does P904-Fr009 correspond to the piece in B-366868 and to 4Q201 fragment 2 in DJD 36 and Langlois? Is there an existing sampling diagram, recto/verso cross-reference or conservation/treatment record that identifies the cut?
2. Is an item-level recovery, accession or custody record available for this piece? A later manuscript profile mentions an officially excavated large fragment and PAM 40.985, but numbering differs; we have not assumed that this is the sampled fragment. A catalogue or field-record reference would be sufficient.
3. Which edition pages and surviving line units should be used for this piece, on either face? We located Langlois’s French rendering on p. 399 and the Stuckenbruck DJD 36 reference (pp. 3–7, plate I); we have not yet verified the exact English translation or whether the 4Q338 designation applies to this particular piece.

Public reading links:
https://www.deadseascrolls.org.il/explore-the-archive/image/B-366868
https://www.deadseascrolls.org.il/explore-the-archive/image/B-298333
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323185
https://lyingpen.uia.no/dssinventoryproject/fascicle10/

Our evolving record is https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/research/document-histories/qumran-4q201/ . We distinguish the parchment measurement from writing, composition and authorship dates. Please point us to existing public records first, or the appropriate office if this falls elsewhere. If a copy requires permission or a fee, please provide the terms and estimate before any work is commissioned. No paid research, new sampling, imaging, reproduction order or translation commission is authorized.

May we publish a concise, attributed factual summary of your response? We will keep the full correspondence and any restricted files private unless permission is given.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre

Dear Library team — please route to the Shrine of the Book or relevant collections/rights office,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. We are checking exact witnesses and lawful routes from source material to public study guides.

We seek reading and publication guidance for the War Scroll 1QM and Genesis Apocryphon 1Q20. We located the Museum’s War Scroll digital viewer and Genesis Retold exhibition material, but want to confirm current item-level custody, stable image/column locators and full surviving-image coverage. We will distinguish 1QM from other War manuscripts such as 4Q285 and will not treat an exhibition page as a current image licence.

Could you provide or point us to existing digital images or files (including all inscribed faces or folios), stable catalogue identifiers, and any available IIIF manifests, downloadable metadata or imaging documentation? Existing public links are welcome; we are not asking for new photography at this stage.

Please identify the relevant published transcription/transliteration, critical edition and English translation, including which surviving passages they cover. If you know of surviving passages still unedited, unreadable or untranslated, please identify them precisely and note any current scholarly work. Physical losses, uncertain readings and lack of access will be recorded separately.

Our intended use is source-linked study on a publicly accessible website, with any new interpretation clearly attributed to Babylon. Which files or metadata may be displayed, embedded or redistributed, and under what licence, attribution, language, translation/derivative and commercial/noncommercial conditions? If permission or fees are required, please provide the process and a quote only; do not begin chargeable work.

If access is limited, please identify the affected item, the reason and applicable public policy, an alternative reading route, and any review or reconsideration process. A reference or referral is sufficient where your office does not hold the material. Please identify the responding office and whether we may publish a concise attributed summary of the factual answer. We will not publish private correspondence automatically.

This inquiry authorizes no purchase, paid research, new digitization, translation commission or reproduction order. Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/
Register: https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/resources/ancient-text-translations/

Dear Professor Hanneken,

I’m writing for Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. We are using the Jubilees Palimpsest Project’s public images, reconstruction, annotation index and bibliography. Thank you for these resources.

Your project page describes an interactive critical edition as the next phase and links a two-page sample. Could you clarify whether a fuller public critical edition has since been released, and which version or stable citation we should use?

For a small pilot we are checking Latin Jubilees 13:10–15, reconstructed page 83 / current page 62, and 13:16–21, reconstructed page 84 / current page 61. Please correct those page mappings if needed. Are line-level transcription or translation annotations available for these exact pages beyond the linked Ceriani transcription and VanderKam translation? An existing annotation identifier, release link or statement of current coverage would be sufficient.

We will distinguish the surviving manuscript, legacy editions, enhanced-image readings and any unresolved text. We will not describe absent annotations as evidence that the passages have never been translated. We will retain source attribution and check each linked resource’s separate licence before reuse.

This requests existing references only, not new imaging, a translation commission or paid work. May we publish a concise attributed factual summary of your answer? Private correspondence will not be reproduced automatically.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/

Madame, Monsieur,

Je vous écris au nom de Babylon Learning Centre, projet indépendant d’étude comparée des textes, au sujet du Zodiaque de Dendéra (E 13482 ; D 38 ; CM 464 ; BN 6), décrit dans votre catalogue. Nous le distinguons bien d’un rouleau ou d’un livre à traduire.

Pourriez-vous nous orienter vers les fichiers numériques déjà disponibles, les vues détaillées et relevés des inscriptions, les notices et la bibliographie de référence ? Nous cherchons notamment les éditions, transcriptions et traductions publiées des inscriptions, ainsi qu’une présentation scientifique de l’iconographie et de la datation. Merci d’indiquer précisément les éventuelles lectures incertaines, lacunes matérielles ou passages restant à étudier.

Nous préparons des guides de lecture accessibles sur Internet, avec nos interprétations propres clairement distinguées des données du musée. Quelles données ou images peuvent être citées, affichées, intégrées ou redistribuées ? Quelles sont les conditions de licence, de crédit, de traduction et de réutilisation commerciale ou non commerciale ? Si nécessaire, pourriez-vous transmettre la demande au service PhotosDAE ou au titulaire des droits compétent ?

Si certains fichiers ne sont pas accessibles, merci d’indiquer les références concernées, le motif, la procédure applicable et une éventuelle solution de consultation. Une réponse bibliographique ou des liens publics suffisent à ce stade. Nous avons pris connaissance des informations relatives au déménagement et aux fermetures de vos services.

Nous ne commandons aucune photographie nouvelle, reproduction, recherche payante ou traduction. Aucun frais n’est autorisé sans accord distinct. Merci de préciser le service répondant et si nous pouvons publier une brève synthèse factuelle attribuée à celui-ci ; nous ne publierons pas automatiquement la correspondance privée.

Avec nos remerciements,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/resources/ancient-text-translations/

Dear Babylonian Section and image permissions team,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. We are checking exact witnesses and lawful routes from source material to public study guides.

Your CBS10673 record describes the Sumerian flood tablet, its join with CBS10867, CDLI P265876 and the ETCSL 1.7.4 comparison. Wasserman’s The Flood: The Akkadian Sources identifies CBS13532 as a separate Akkadian Nippur witness, Ms. J. Please confirm the latter’s present custody and current catalogue link. We want to keep the joined Sumerian object and the separate Akkadian witness distinct.

Could you provide or point us to existing digital images or files (including all inscribed faces or folios), stable catalogue identifiers, and any available IIIF manifests, downloadable metadata or imaging documentation? Existing public links are welcome; we are not asking for new photography at this stage.

Please identify the relevant published transcription/transliteration, critical edition and English translation, including which surviving passages they cover. If you know of surviving passages still unedited, unreadable or untranslated, please identify them precisely and note any current scholarly work. Physical losses, uncertain readings and lack of access will be recorded separately.

Our intended use is source-linked study on a publicly accessible website, with any new interpretation clearly attributed to Babylon. Which files or metadata may be displayed, embedded or redistributed, and under what licence, attribution, language, translation/derivative and commercial/noncommercial conditions? If permission or fees are required, please provide the process and a quote only; do not begin chargeable work.

If access is limited, please identify the affected item, the reason and applicable public policy, an alternative reading route, and any review or reconsideration process. A reference or referral is sufficient where your office does not hold the material. Please identify the responding office and whether we may publish a concise attributed summary of the factual answer. We will not publish private correspondence automatically.

This inquiry authorizes no purchase, paid research, new digitization, translation commission or reproduction order. Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/
Register: https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/resources/ancient-text-translations/

Dear Babylonian Section team,

A brief supplement to our 5 November inquiry, rather than a request to expedite it: we are now separating manufacture, discovery and acquisition dates in a document-history record for CBS10673/CBS10867.

Your public CBS10673 record dates the text to the seventeenth century BCE by script and gives the credit “Gift of the Sultan; Babylonian Expedition to Nippur, 1896”:
https://collections.penn.museum/collections/object/97591

Could you point us to existing references for:
1. The excavation or accession register identifying the finder, season, trench/locus and early custody of these fragments, including whether 1896 is an acquisition credit rather than the exact find date.
2. The publication or catalogue argument underlying the script-based date, including comparison material or a stated range.
3. The published documentation for the CBS10673/CBS10867 join and any existing photograph-to-edition concordance.

A stable link, reference number or referral is sufficient. We are not asking for new research or photography. If any existing record or study copy requires a fee, please identify its scope and supply an estimate only; do not place an order or start chargeable work. Please distinguish private study from permission to reproduce images or archival documents publicly.

We will preserve unknowns and cite public records; no private correspondence will be reproduced automatically.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/
Reference: BLC-PENN-20261105 / BLC-HISTORY-20261107

Dear Ptolemaeus Arabus et Latinus team,

Babylon Learning Centre is checking a narrowly defined manuscript reference
before preparing a study guide. Your record for Pal. lat. 1377 identifies
an Almagest star catalogue on ff.183r–194v and a later note comparing
precession values on f.194v: https://ptolemaeus.badw.de/ms/826.

Could you point us to any published transcription, edition or translation
of that specific note, and to scholarship identifying its author or hand,
date, sources and numerical values? If those details remain uncertain, we
would welcome that clarification.

We also seek an independent qualified reader to check a short folio-level
transcription and translation once images are available. Is there an
appropriate publicly listed scholar, project or institutional route for
asking about such a review? We are not assuming that your catalogue team
has agreed to perform it.

Our aim is to separate what the manuscript actually states, later editorial
interpretation and our own comparative teaching. Please note any
corrections to our reading of your catalogue. No review fee, commission or
paid order is authorized; any proposal would require separate agreement.

Please let us know the respondent’s scholarly role and whether we may
attribute a brief factual summary. Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/

Dear Professor Cox and the Early Buddhist Manuscripts Project,

I’m writing for Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. We are building an evidence register separating translated manuscripts, unpublished editions, surviving passages without a located translation, physical loss and access restrictions.

Your publications page identifies translated editions and a work-in-progress list, including a Gāndhārī Abhidharma text associated with British Library Kharoṣṭhī Fragment 28. Because the page also contains older bibliographic information, we do not treat that listing as proof that the fragment remains unpublished or untranslated today. Could you confirm its current edition and translation status, relevant identifiers, surviving coverage and responsible custodian?

Is there a current manuscript-to-edition concordance or public list of texts still awaiting publication or English translation? A manageable selection of exact items would be sufficient. Please distinguish work in progress, unreadable or lost passages and texts whose translations exist but are not freely online. Referrals to the relevant custodians are welcome; we do not presume your project holds all originals.

Could you point us to existing public images, catalogues, transcriptions and translations, and explain any access or reproduction requirements? We would welcome guidance on qualified independent language review and how competing readings should be recorded.

Please provide free reading routes first. This authorizes no paid work, digitization, translation commission or purchase; any fee requires a quote and separate written authorization. May we publish a concise attributed factual summary of your answer on our public access desk? Private replies will not be reproduced automatically.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/

Dear Dr Montuschi,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre, an independent
comparative-text learning project. We are seeking bibliographical guidance
for specifically identified Vatican Library manuscripts.

The PAL catalogue describes a later note comparing precession values on
Pal. lat. 1377, folio 194v (https://ptolemaeus.badw.de/ms/826). Jordanus
also lists Abraham ibn Ezra material on ff.21ra–42va (
https://ptolemaeus.badw.de/jordanus/ms/9985). Separately, the Library’s
digital viewer identifies Vat. gr. 1291, discussed in scholarship as a
witness to Ptolemy’s Handy Tables.

Could you advise: (1) which current descriptive catalogue and published
editions cover these particular passages or tables; (2) whether a
transcription or English translation already exists, with its exact scope;
and (3) which stable image or IIIF links are appropriate for reading the
named folios?

If any item is unavailable, please indicate, insofar as possible, whether
the issue is conservation, digitization, admission, copyright/reproduction
rights or another documented restriction, and the applicable public policy.
We are asking what is currently accessible, not presuming a right to
unrestricted access.

Please identify the office or scholarly capacity of the respondent and
whether we may attribute a concise factual summary to that office. No paid
research, reproduction order, translation commission or permission to
republish images is being requested or authorized.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/

Dear Dr Montuschi,

I’m writing on behalf of Babylon Learning Centre, an independent comparative-text learning project. We seek bibliographic guidance and existing digital reading routes for individually identified Vatican Library manuscripts.

The PAL catalogue describes a later precession note on Pal. lat. 1377 f.194v (https://ptolemaeus.badw.de/ms/826). Jordanus lists Abraham ibn Ezra material on ff.21ra–42va (https://ptolemaeus.badw.de/jordanus/ms/9985). Separately, DigiVatLib provides a viewer for Vat. gr. 1291, discussed in scholarship as a witness to Ptolemy’s Handy Tables.

Could you identify the relevant descriptive catalogues, folio/image or IIIF locators and any downloadable files already available? Which published transcriptions, critical editions and English translations cover these particular passages or tables, and which surviving portions, if any, remain unedited or untranslated?

Our planned use is a source-linked, publicly accessible study site. Please distinguish private reading, linking or embedding, public image display, metadata redistribution and publication of a new independently checked translation. What licence, credit, permission or fee applies to each? If a file is unavailable, please identify the affected item, reason, applicable policy and any alternative reading or reconsideration route.

Please identify the responding office or scholarly capacity and whether we may publish a concise attributed factual summary. We are not presenting these manuscripts as a match to an unidentified modern Venus-tracking reference. No paid research, imaging, translation commission, purchase or reproduction order is authorized.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/

Dear Vatican Observatory team,

Babylon Learning Centre is preparing a source-linked comparison of
scientific astronomy, historical astronomical manuscripts and Catholic
teaching. We would appreciate pointers to your published material rather
than an endorsement of our interpretation.

Could you direct us to: (1) public publications, catalogues or data
repositories documenting the Observatory’s stellar-position or planetary
research; (2) any published Venus observation programme or relevant data
covering 2026, if one exists; and (3) the relevant data-access or release
policy, including how to request access to an identified dataset not
already online?

We also want to explain accurately the distinction between scientific
observations or ephemerides and the astrology/divination addressed in
Catechism §2116. Is there a published Observatory explanation, and which
Church office is appropriate for questions about the theological boundary
between astronomical prediction, religious reflection and claimed
revelation under §2115?

We have not verified any document supporting a source-list phrase about a
‘2026 Venus completion’. If that phrase has no recognized scientific
meaning or is insufficiently defined, please say so; we do not ask you to
infer a programme from it.

Please identify the office or scientific capacity of the respondent and
whether a short, attributed summary may be used in our source register.
This is a bibliographic and public-data inquiry only. No paid work, licence
or order is authorized.

Thank you,
Babylon Learning Centre
https://learn.babylonencyclopedia.com/

Babylon Research — Ancient Manuscripts Desk
Reference: MS-4Q271

Hello,

We are mapping original manuscript witnesses and lawful access routes for independent source-linked research. Our aim is a documented copy, transcription, translation and independent specialist review, with gaps and reconstructions kept visible. This is an inquiry, not a claim that access is being improperly withheld.

Record: Damascus Document · Qumran witness
Witness / shelfmark: 4Q271 · Dᶠ
Institution / catalogue lead: Israel Antiquities Authority · credited lender in 1993 Library of Congress exhibition; current custody pending

1. Please confirm the exact shelfmark, catalogue identifier, work and manuscript witness.
2. Please confirm current custody and the appropriate manuscript or imaging contact; a publisher is not assumed to hold the original.
3. Which pages, columns, fragments and sides survive, and what is missing or uncertain?
4. Are lawful digital images, a IIIF manifest, facsimile or supervised reading options available? Please provide stable locators.
5. What image resolution, spectral imaging, scale, metadata and provenance accompany the copy?
6. What copying, quotation, translation, research and publication permissions apply? Please distinguish each use.
7. Which transcriptions and critical editions correspond to this exact witness, and how do they mark damaged text and editorial reconstruction?
8. Which existing translations, languages, translators and editions are available, with their coverage and limitations?
9. Could an appropriately qualified language or palaeography specialist review a proposed transcription/translation, and how should competing readings be documented?
10. Please identify contrary catalogue information, uncertain attribution, access restrictions and correction routes, and direct us to the proper custodian if needed.

Known limits: The Library of Congress was an exhibition venue, not established current custodian. Cairo Geniza CD witnesses and other Qumran copies require separate records; partial translation is not complete coverage.
Sources: https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/scrolls/scr4.html
https://www.deadseascrolls.org.il/explore-the-archive?locale=en_US

Please provide free access options first. Any fee requires a quote and our separate written authorization; this request authorizes no order or charge. We seek manuscript evidence and lawful research access, not confidential personal records or automatic republication rights. Do not send private donor, employee or reader information.

Thank you,
Babylon Research
Ancient Manuscripts Desk
research.babylonencyclopedia.com